Wounded Knee

Pine Ridge Reservation, 1973

Occupation of Wounded Knee

Occupation of Wounded Knee 

In the last election for tribal chairman, Richard Wilson was elected. Less than fifty percent of the people voted. They now want to impeach him, but Wilson postpones his own hearing. In the meantime, an exchange of ugly remarks in a white bar leads to a fight between a Sioux and the whites. The Sioux is struck from behind with a beer bottle. When the police arrive they arrest the Sioux; when other Sioux hear about this they tear apart four other white bars that have a reputation for being abusive to natives. The police arbitrarily arrest forty Sioux, and the people protest.

In this highly charged atmosphere, Sioux leaders ask members of a new organization called the American Indian Movement (AIM) to come onto the reservation and help publicize the situation. AIM is dedicated to reclaiming the civil rights of the native populations and see that the government upholds its past treaty obligations.

The police openly ride around with shotguns in their cars, and vigilante groups form. Dennis Banks and Russell Means, two AIM leaders, promise that they will give the people the protection they need and will help to bring the situation to the attention of the U.S. government.

One of their first actions is to form a caravan of sixty to seventy cars. They stop first at Wounded Knee where a mass grave of the massacre victims lies. As they reflect on the past, they begin to see a way toward the future. The only way to expose their living conditions and sue once more for their rights is to retake Wounded Knee.

They begin their action on February 27.  The first building they occupy is Sacred Hearth Church, beside which is the long trench containing the bodies of the 153 victims of the original massacre. They block the roads and occupy the remaining buildings. They have three demands. They want:

  1. Richard Wilson removed from office and preferably a return to the traditional way of tribal chiefs,
  2. Dismissal of two BIA officials and a Senate investigation of corruption in the BIA, and
  3. The Senate Foreign Relations Committee to hold hearings of 371 treaties negotiated between the United States and various indigenous nations, few of which have been honored by the United States.

The U.S. government refuses to negotiate and calls in the FBI with automatic weapons, helicopters, gas grenade launchers, tracer bullets, and armored personnel carriers.

The standoff begins.  There are intermittent fire fights. Wounded Knee is difficult to defend militarily because it is in a shallow valley surrounded by hills. The FBI places their guns on the same hills where the old Hotchkiss guns were mounted in 1890.

From all over the country, native peoples respond to the occupation by sending supplies or coming themselves. At one point representatives from sixty-five different tribes are present. The FBI tries to block all reinforcements and supplies. Hikers go through the back trails in the dead of night to carry in food. The FBI charges those caught with a felony violation punishable up to five years in prison and a ten thousand dollar fine. As the siege heads into its second month, the food supplies run low and it looks as though the occupiers may have to give up. Then a clandestine airlift drops parachute after parachute of food in a predawn flight.

As the siege goes on, the fire fights increase in duration and intensity. More than ten thousand bullets stream into Wounded Knee from the surrounding hills in just one night of fighting. One of the vigilante goon squads turns off the water supply, leaving the occupiers without sanitation facilities or safe drinking water.

Inside, the occupiers develop a cooperative community. Work is shared. They hold a spiritual gathering, build a sweat lodge, and learn more about their own culture. On March 11 Wounded Knee declares its sovereignty from the United States of America. It is now land controlled by the Independent Oglala Sioux Nation.

A Harris Poll finds that fifty-one percent of the U.S. population supports the Sioux occupation of Wounded Knee. Finally an agreement is reached to allow the AIM leaders to meet at the White House. The meeting never takes place. Once the leaders are out of Wounded Knee, the U.S. government demands that they lay down all of their weapons before there are further negotiations. Remembering what happened when Big Foot gave up his weapons in 1890, the occupiers refuse.

The occupation lasts for seventy-one days. Two occupiers are dead and fifteen others wounded. In the end a group of Sioux elders, the traditional tribal leadership, negotiates with the U.S. government, demanding and receiving assurances on virtually the same set of demands that the occupiers originally made.

Wounded Knee is no longer just the site of a massacre—it is also the site of a victory.  Wounded Knee and AIM become a rallying point for a new spirit of resistance among the native peoples.

 

See Bill Zimmerman, Airlift to Wounded Knee

 

http://www.dickshovel.com/Aim.Pine.html

http://www.dickshovel.com/Aim.Pine.html

 

 

 

Reservations and Renewed Resistance


Battle of Wounded Knee

The reservation system, set up by the U.S. government, destroyed the native people. The Bureau of Indian Affairs institutionalized the theft and manipulation of native land and systematically stripped the native peoples of their culture, religion, language and way of governance. Mission schools specifically saw their purpose as “civilizing” and ”Christianizing” the children and making them patriotic U.S. citizens.

Decades of this system led in the 1970s to an eruption of protests and demonstrations on the part of the native people and their allies to reclaim the civil and human rights and economic development that the United States took from them. Takeovers at Alcatraz and Wounded Knee galvanized native peoples into a new resistance struggle. The ecological awakening during that period, continuing until today, sparked a renewed interest in the indigenous way of life, including their culture, religion, and view of the earth.

On November 9, 1969, seventy-eight native people made a predawn landing on Alcatraz Island in San Francisco Bay. The takeover was extraordinarily dramatic and focused world attention on Indian protest. By November 30, nearly six hundred Indians, representing more than fifty tribes, were living on the island. Their numbers decreased drastically in later months, as the U.S. government cut off telephones, electricity, and water in the hope that they would leave altogether. But the Indians were unyielding. They incorporated themselves as Indians of All Tribes and remained until they were forcefully removed a year and a half later.

 

See Chronicles of American Indian Protest, 310; Dee Brown, Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee, 226-233; Bill Zimmerman, Airlift to Wounded Knee, 42-48.

 

http://www.nps.gov/history/nagpra/documents/resmap.htm

War for Paha Sapa (Black Hills)

Paha Sapa

In 1872, rumors abounded that there was gold in the Black Hills. Miners, wagon trains, and cavalry led by General George Armstrong Custer beat a trail known as Thieves’ Road to the area. Custer was also knows as Squaw Killer because of his massacre of Black Kettle and his people on the Washita river in 1868.

Paha Sapa was sacred to the indigenous people. In the summer they went there to commune with the Great Spirit and seek visions. This was the center of the world, the point from which the hoop of the world bent in four directions.

Just four years before, in the Treaty of 1868, that land had been given to the Sioux forever. Now the government tried to get the Black Hills through treaty, but the Sioux refused. The Peace Commissioners then recommended that Congress decide on a “fair equivalent value” and present it to the Indians as “finality.”

The United States offered the Sioux six million dollars for the Black Hills. The Sioux rejected the offer for good reason: just one Black Hills mine would eventually yield five hundred million dollars. By February 1876, the War Department authorized General Sheridan to begin military actions against the “hostile Sioux,” including Sitting Bull and Crazy Horse.

Crazy Horse joined forces with Sitting Bull; they made their camps on the banks of the Little Big Horn. There were ten thousand people with three to four thousand warriors, their camps spreading for three miles. On June 24, 1876 General George Armstrong Custer came looking for the Sioux. He had split his forces into three columns. The Sioux, defending their women and children along the Little Big Horn, wiped out Custer and over 180 of his men. It was the worst military defeat that the U.S. government had ever suffered in the wars with the native peoples.

The whites viewed the defeat as a massacre. More soldiers hunted down the Sioux. For over a year Sitting Bull and Crazy Horse kept the soldiers at bay. Finally, Sitting Bull took his people to Canada while Crazy Horse continued to fight. In 1877, after a long winter, the United States offered Crazy Horse and his people a reservation in the Powder River country, the most precious of territory to the Sioux. Crazy Horse brought his people to the fort and waited for the promised territory. After four months he decided to take the land and marches his people to the Powder River.

Eight companies of soldiers rode out and arrested him. During the arrest procedure, Crazy Horse balked at the prison cell after he saw men in chains. Glad for an excuse to kill him, one of the soldiers ran his bayonet through Crazy Horse’s stomach

The Sioux mourned his death for weeks. His parents finally took his bones and heart and buried them in a desolate spot on their trek to Canada, near a creek called Wounded Knee. The U.S. military had never defeated Crazy Horse in battle.

More and more whites flooded into Sioux and Cheyenne territory, and the U.S. government tried to wrest more and more land from the tribes. In 1889, they “legally” stole land out in the middle of the Sioux reservation. The state was set for the end of the frontier and the way of life the native populations had known for millennia.

That end came in 1890 at Wounded Knee. It was the final large-scale military massacre committed by the whites against the indigenous. Many more deaths of native peoples would follow due to poverty, despair, injustice, but not until the 1970s would the big guns again be fired on the Sioux.

 

http://www.georgearmstrongcuster.com/

http://www.hanksville.org/daniel/misc/Custer.html

http://www.eyewitnesstohistory.com/knee.htm

 

 

Legacies of the Conquest

Gifts to the Indians

 

Hubert Bancroft
 
Hubert Bancroft, an energetic New Englander was successively, secretary of the Navy, ambassador to Great Britain, Prussia, and the German Empire, and the president of various scholarly societies during the nineteenth century. Writing in 1883, he asked some critical questions:
 
What should we do were a foreign power to come in ships to our shore and begin to slaughter our animals, to stake off our land and divide it among themselves? We should drive them away if we were able; but if we found them the stronger, we should employ every art to destroy them, and in so doing regard ourselves as patriots performing a sacred obligation.
 
This is the Indian’s crime; and in so doing we call him cunning, revengeful, hateful, diabolical. But the white man brings him blankets, it may be said, brings him medicine, tells him of contrivances, teaches him civilization. These things are exactly what the savage does not want, and what he is much better off without. The white man’s comforts kill him almost as quickly as do his cruelties; and the teachings of Christ’s ministers are abhorrent if they are coupled with the examples of lecherous and murderous professors of Christianity….
 
White men have killed fifty Indians where Indians have killed one white man, and this, notwithstanding that nine-tenths of all injuries inflicted have been perpetrated by white invaders.
 
A thousand Indian women have been outraged by men whose mothers had taught them the Lord’s prayer, where one white woman has been injured by these benighted heathen. At any time in the history of America I would rather take my chances as a white woman among savages, than as an Indian woman among white people.
 
H.H. Bancroft, Collected works in 1492: Discovery/Invasion/Encounter, 72

http://www.1st-hand-history.org/Hhb/HHBindex.htm

 

Genocide

Victims of Wounded Knee
 
…In other areas, the Indian whom typhus does not kill dies of hunger or hardship.
 
There are corpses in the fields and in the plazas, and there are houses filled with them in which all died and no one remained to tell of it.
 
Throughout Mexico the pestilence is raising such a stink of putrefaction and smoke that we Spaniards have to about holding our noses.
 
Eduardo Galeano, Memory of Fire: Genesis, 150
 
From the second voyage, the two others later undertaken by Columbus, and the many mounted thereafter by other explorers from not only Spain but also other countries in Europe, comes the legacy of a resounding clash between strikingly different cultures. The overpowering of one by the other led to many of the agonies we suffer from today. Racism and environmental destruction are two that immediately come to mind.
 
Very quickly, the inhabitants of the “new world” discovered that the Spaniards and, later, colonizers from other parts of Europe, notably England, France, and Holland, wanted only their gold, or silver, or pearls, or fur, or land. They themselves were most likely to be killed or enslaved.
 
Furthermore, the Europeans brought the diseases that ran rampant in the area that had once been so filled with health. “The raging epidemics of Europe’s most tragic centuries repeated themselves in America. Not even the most brutally depraved of the conquistadors was able purposely to slaughter Indians on the scale that the gentle priest unwittingly accomplished by going from his sickbed ministrations to lay his hands in blessing on his Indian converts” (Jennings, 22).
 
Researchers now give the figure of ninety percent decline in population within a century after European contact, much of it due to the viruses and microbes introduced from the “old world.” The natives of the West had no immunity to such diseases as influenza, typhus, pneumonia, tuberculosis, measles, pleurisy, diphtheria, or smallpox.
 
Statistics aren’t reliable for many reasons, including the inaccurate estimates of the original size of the population, but the region of Hispaniola can serve as an example. A detailed census taken in 1514 listed twenty-eight thousand people in the area that housed eight million twenty years earlier. “That is more than decimation; it is carnage of more than ninety-nine percent, something we must call closer to genocide, and within a single generation. By 1542, according to Las Casas, who was there at the time, only two hundred Tainos remained” (Sale, 161).
 
It is also known that in central Mexico, the population decreased from thirty million to four million in a few decades. The rapid, massive decline in population, referred to as “the most extreme demographic disaster in human history” (Ortiz, 8), was caused by colonial warfare, massacres, massive deportations of natives as slaves, overwork in the mines, starvation or malnutrition after food production broke down, and suicide, as well as epidemics.
 
All the socioeconomic factors increased the Indians’ vulnerability to the strange new diseases that began to plague them. They were psychologically as well as physically unprepared for such an overwhelming onslaught.

 

Day of the Indian

 
Pedro Alvarez Cabral
 
In 1997 representatives of nine different tribes issued the following message:
 
…We want to say that the 22nd of April, 1500, when Pedro Alvarez Cabral stepped for the first time on these lands, was the beginning of the expansion of western civilization and the beginning of the end of the indigenous societies.
 
With the passage of the years, our destruction was intensified, carried out by western civilization. The most diverse instruments of degradation were used in the massacre of the indigenous groups. Factors contributing to this process were sicknesses brought by the white man which had until then been unknown to us, the plundering of our lands, and the application of colonialists and ethnocentric educational methods which did not respect our political, economic and religious structure.
 
So much so that in the sixteenth century the Indians were considered irrational animals, and it was necessary for Pope Paul III to declare to the public of the time that we were human beings, with body and soul. But in spite of this, the destruction of the indigenous people continued.

Roger Moody, ed., The Indigenous Voice, 356

 

Dietary Legacy

Making dirt cookies to feed hungry children in Haiti

A legacy of those colonial days which continues is the custom of eating dirt. Lack of iron produces anemia, and instinct leads Northeastern children to eat dirt to gain the mineral salts which are absent from their diet of manioc starch, beans, and—with luck—dried meat. In former times this “African vice” was punished by putting muzzles on the children or by hanging them in willow baskets far above the ground.
 
Eduardo Galeano, Open Veins of Latin America, 75

http://www.cdc.gov/NCIDOD/EID/vol9no8/03-0033.htm

 

Ripple Effects

 

Destruction of old growth forests

The ripple effects of the environmental destruction wrought on the land by the colonists were far-reaching.

The destruction of old-growth forests meant the elimination of certain intricate econiches and their microbial and faunal patterns, the emigration of bird and animal populations, and the invasion of pioneer species that prevented the natural succession from every producing again the great trees or the carpets of native wildflowers. Local and regional climatic changes followed, with new conditions of wind, temperature, humidity, and soil moisture, and even seasons that proved inhospitable to many kinds of plants and animals but to which the vast numbers of new European species—cattle, pigs, horses, rats, dandelions, and so on—adapted rapidly, without predators or pathogens to hinder them.

All in all, the presence of just a few hundred thousands of the European branch of the human species, within just a century after its landing, did more to alter the environment of North America, in some places and for many populations quite irretrievably, than the many millions of the American branch had done in fifteen centuries or more.

Kirkpatrick Sale, The Conquest of Paradise, 291-292

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_growth_forest

 

Destruction of the Environment

Mayan farming
 
Besides killing the people with their weapons, demands, and diseases, the Europeans brought about great destruction to the physical environment. Plant forms were imported with no thought of their effect on the land. Wheat and chickpeas, staples of the Mediterranean diet, withered and died in the heat, and although other plants fared slightly better, at least at first the Spanish seemed to make no effort to adopt the much more productive Taino crops and methods of agriculture.

The animals brought by the Spanish: dogs, cattle, horses, and pigs, dominated and then destroyed native habitats, including carefully-nurtured conuco farms which featured companion planting. They depleted the native grass species and stripped the ground cover, thereby causing erosion.

Invasive plants also had a very negative effect, especially some that were produced for profit such as sugar. Mono-drop open-field planting, in long rows, required cutting and clearing the forests, as opposed to the Taino method of digging a hole and dropping in a seed, which had nourished both human being sand the eco-system for centuries.

Another long-lasting negative legacy was the new system of land ownership that created an elite class and denied ownership to indigenous populations, so they couldn’t possibly continue their careful cultivation methods.

In a few decades soils were eroded, rivers began to fill up with silt and sometimes went dry, forests were destroyed, and the climate was altered. By 1498 Columbus wrote that in the Cape Verde Islands he couldn’t see a single green thing and observed that everything had become dry and sterile.

Two decades after Columbus’s tenure as governor, Alonso de Zuaso wrote to a friend at the Spanish court, “If I were to tell you all the damage that has been done, I should never make an end….Although these islands had been, since God made the earth, prosperous and full of people lacking nothing they needed; yet…they were laid waste, inhabited only by wild animals and birds, and useless indeed for the service either of God or of Their Highnesses.” Some years later de Las Casas wrote of Hispaniola: “It was the first to be destroyed and made into desert” (Sale, 165-166). But, as we now know all too well, not the last.

Later, in North America, environmental devastation continued. Beavers and other fur-bearing animals; herbivores like deer, moose, antelope, caribou, elk, and wood bison; and game birds like turkeys, ducks, geese, and passenger pigeons were vastly depleted in numbers if not totally exterminated by 1640.

Forests were cleared both to get lumber and to make room for cash crops like tobacco. In Virginia by the end of the seventeenth century, half a million acres had been deforested and such species as white oak, white cedar, and black walnut were exterminated.

 

Different Worldviews

Chief Luther Standing Bear

There was a great difference in the attitude taken by the Indian and the Caucasian toward nature, and this difference made of one a conservationist and of the other non-conservationist of life. The Indian, as well as all other creatures that were given birth and grew, were sustained by the common mother—earth. He was therefore kin to all living things and he gave to all creatures equal rights with himself. Everything of earth was loved and reverenced. The philosophy of the Caucasian was, “Things of the earth, earth”—to be belittled and despised.

Forests were mowed down, the buffalo exterminated, the beaver driven to extinction and his wonderfully constructed dams dynamited, allowing flood waters to wreak further havoc, and the very birds of the air silenced. Great grass plains that sweetened the air have been upturned; springs, streams, and lakes that lived no longer ago than my boyhood have dried, and a whole people harassed to degradation and death. The white man has come to be the symbol of extinction for all things natural to this continent.

Chief Luther Standing Bear, Land of the Spotted Eagle in Rethinking Columbus, 84

 

Conquest Myth

European explorers and invaders discovered an inhabited land. Had it been pristine wilderness then, it would possibly be so still today, for neither the technology nor the social organization of Europe in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries had the capacity to maintain, of its own resources, outpost colonies thousands of miles from home. Incapable of conquering true wilderness, the Europeans were highly competent in the skill of conquering other people, and that is what they did. They did not settle a virgin land. They invaded and displaced a resident population.

The basic conquest myth postulates that America was virgin land, or wilderness, inhabited by non people called savages; that these savages were creatures sometimes defined as demons, sometimes as beasts “in the shape of men”; that their mode of existence and cast of mind were such as to make them incapable of civilization and therefore of full humanity; that civilization was required by divine sanction or the imperative of progress to conquer the wilderness and make it a garden; that the savage creatures of the wilderness being unable to adapt to any environment other than the wild, stubbornly and viciously resisted God or fate, and thereby incurred their suicidal extermination; that civilization and its bearers were refined and ennobled in their contest with the dark powers of the wilderness; and that it all was inevitable.

Francis Jennings, The Invasion of America, 15

 

Conquest Reality

 

Winona LaDuke

The story is not a pleasant one. The dramatic meeting of two civilizations had dire consequences that continue to plague the descendants of the main players. One of the greatest tragedies is that the conquerors failed to recognize the true riches they had stumbled upon: the fertile, life-giving land; the wide variety of experiments in human relations practiced by the inhabitants, and especially the patterns of respect for nature and “right living” honored throughout the hemisphere.

Even as the settlers took advantage of the primeval richness of the soil to grow their crops, the pristine quality of the lakes and rivers to provide fish and fur, and the teeming wildlife to give them meat, they saw the land only as a wilderness to be brought under man’s control. Even as they used the government of the Iroquois Confederacy as the model for their own and adopted the crops developed by natives as the basis of the agriculture, they thought of Indians as “savage.”

Never once in their arrogance did they stumble upon the single fact that in subsuming the wilderness and the Indian within their synthesis they were irrevocably cutting themselves off from the very substance of the new life they were forging in North America.

Winona LaDuke, “Natural to Synthetic and Back Again,” Marxism and Native Americans, ii

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gxnj2tk54JY

 

Challenge by the Natives

 From the beginning of the conquest, individuals and groups within the nations encountered by the explorers challenged the worldviews of the invaders. Tundama was the defender of the Sogamoso area in what is now Columbia, which contained an ancient shrine. In 1541, Baltasar Maldonado made Tundama an offer of peace that included a demand of tribute. His reply hints of the hundreds of years of resistance to come:

I am not so barbarous, famous Spaniard, not to believe peace to be the center on which the bounds of this world depend; but do not think I’m unaware that the gland words with which you offer it to me are much belied by your harsh behavior.

Who will say that Tundama should give to the vassal the tribute due to the king? I cannot serve someone who serves his king so badly. According to your own accounts of the King of Spain’s clemency, it is not credible that he should send you to kill and rob us so.

More barbarian than the Panches and the Muzos [rival tribes], you bath your horses’ mouths in our blood, which they drink out of hunger and thirst and which you spill to display your cruelty. You desecrate the sanctuaries of our gods and sack the houses of men who haven’t offended you. Who would choose to undergo these insults, being not insensitive? Who would omit to rid himself of such harassment, even at the cost of h is life?

You well know that my people were bred with no fewer natural privileges than yours. We now know that you are not immortal or descended from the sun. Since your people refuse tax and tyranny you cannot be surprised that mine do, with determination.

Note well the survivors who await you, to undeceive you that victory is always yours.

Gordon Brotherston, ed., Image of the New World, 48

Our Task

The legacies of the conquest will be with us for years to come. Now it is time to look at the history of the event in a new way, to let the voices of the oppressed speak to us, to tell us their memories and share their wisdom, to teach us from their vast experience of living on earth. 

Unless the conditions that foster oppression are addressed with the urgency and direction they demand, we will continue to suffer from the ignorance, blindness, and greed that have diminished human possibilities during the centuries since 1492.

http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/European_Colonization_of_the_Americas

 

 

Post-Reading Strategies

Roots of Racism

Discrimination began when the Spanish arrived, invading our land, destroying our culture and our lives. They tied up our kings and burned them alive because our king would not betray the population to the foreign invaders who only brought deceit, pain, destruction, and death as they attempted to seize a rich history and culture….The indigenous population, the true owners of the lands, were related to the bottom of the new society.

Isabel Gutierrez, “Constructors of Our Own History: The Indigenous of Guatemal,” Basta! December, 1990

 

Though the word itself did not exist at the time, the incidents which transpired between Columbus, the European nation-states, and the indigenous people of the Americas could today be labeled racist. Many historians and social critics have suggested that these incidents triggered and extended into the Western Hemisphere a system of economic, political, and social assumptions and of aggressive institutional and individual behavior against people which prevails to this day and is known as racism.

Select an approach from among the following activities to examine your own concepts of racism, its existence today, and its connections with the history presented in this chapter and in this entire book of Dangerous Memories.

Debating the Roots of Racism

 
 
Quilt by Christine Adams

Choose a debate topic from the following or create a statement of your own for debate.

 

Resolved: That the roots of racism which took hold in the Americas when Columbus reached the shores of this continent were inevitable, given the religious, economic, political, and social conditions of the European nation-states of the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries. 

Resolved: That the Europeans brought civilization to the Western Hemisphere.

Coding Racism

“Shades of Diversity” quilt by Christine Adams

 

Step 1: Developing a Code

Understanding the ways in which we are connected to this history of five hundred years ago requires that we look at our own experience today and recognize the ways in which the economic, political, and social systems begun by colonization extend into our lives. For this activity you will be asked to developed a “code.” A code is:

  • A concrete example of a common experience or problem situation;
  • A familiar situation/dilemma with no particular solution presented;
  • A problem that can be broken down into parts; and
  • A motivator for thinking about situations and dialoguing about them

After the presentation of the code, members of the group or class dialogue about the incident portrayed, analyze the situation, try to connect it to their own experience, and generate alternatives and resolutions. The codes you develop here should reflect present-day experiences of discrimination and/or racism.

Within a small group develop the code (a story, a role-played scene, a drawing, a cartoon, a photograph, or a collage) which can be presented to a class or larger group. This story or representation should reflect an incident, a concrete common experience, or a physical image which demonstrates some aspect of discrimination and/or racism.

Examples of Codes:

Example One

A dialogue heard at a school board meeting:

President:             We’ll open the meeting now to comments from the public.

Parent:                   I want to bring up a concern of mine—and of several other parents who’ve been meeting formally. We think the school should spend less money on teachers who have only small groups of children.

President:             What kind of classes are you referring to?

Parent:                   Those classes with only ten or fifteen children in them where they are always speaking in Spanish. That takes too many teachers. Furthermore, they should be speaking in English.

 

Example Two

Person #1:            I want my pen.

Person #2:            You gave it to me to use.

Person #1:            Well, now I need it back.

Person #2:            You’re an Indian giver.      

 

 

Step 2: Defining Racism

Use the following description to help you develop codes which show critical aspects of racism.

 

Racism

“…any attitude, action or institutional structure which subordinates a person or group because of their color….Racism is not just a matter of attitudes: actions and institutional structures can also be a form of racism.” (From Racism in America and How to Combat It, U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 1970)

Cultural Racism

“…when whites use power to perpetuate their cultural heritage and impose it upon others, while at the same time destroying the culture of ethnic minorities.” (From Teaching Ethnic Studies, National Council for the Social Studies, 1973)

Racism

“…imposition of a system of exploitation and elimination of a culture and people.” (From “Listen, People of the World: Racism in Guatemala, Daniel Eduardo Matul Moralies in Basta! December, 1990)

Racism

“…a tool used by the dominant society to keep people divided and distracted from the real issues of life.” (From “A Voice from Home,” James Yellowbank in Basta! December, 1990)

Racism

“…is not a desire to wake up every morning and lynch a black man from a tall tree. It is not engaging in vulgar epithets. These kinds of people are just fools. It is the day to day indignities, the subtle humiliations that are so devastating. Racism is the assumption of superiority of one group over another, with all the gross arrogance that goes along with it. Racism is a part of us….” (Whitney Young, Congress for Racial Equality

Racism

“…is enforced and maintained by legal, cultural, religious, educational, economic, political, and military institutions in societies.” (From “Policy Statement on Racial Justice,” National Council of Churches of Christ in the U.S.A.,” in Basta! December, 1990)

On racism

“If white people have suffered less obviously from racism than black people, they have nevertheless suffered greatly; the cost has been greater perhaps than we yet know. IF the white man has inflicted the wound of racism upon black men, the cost has been that he would receive the mirror image of that wound into himself.” (From Wendell Berry, The Hidden Wound)

On child development and racism

“Children who develop in this way (white-centered and reacting to skin color) are robbed of opportunities for emotional and intellectual growth, stunted in basic development of the self so that they cannot experience or accept humanity. It is quite possible to build into children a great feeling and compassion for animals and an unconscious fear and rejection of differing human beings. Such persons are by no means prepared to live and move with either appreciation or effectiveness in today’s world.” (From A. Citron, “The Rightness of Whiteness,” in Judity Katz, White Awareness)

Subscribe to Wounded Knee